🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “total contradiction” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

Documents seen by journalists dispatched by the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the African officials asks for measures restricting tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be abandoned or delayed.

The company is attempting amendments to a proposed legislation that include lowering the proposed size of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavoured tobacco products, and diminished punishments for any firms breaking the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“As an elected official, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” commented the anti-tobacco campaigner.

More than 7,000 Zambians a year succumb to cigarette-linked health conditions, according to World Health Organization estimates.

Chimbala said the letter was known to have been circulated to several government departments and was in distribution within public interest organizations.

International corporate influence worries

The situation emerges alongside broader worries about corporate intervention with medical guidelines. Last month, international health experts issued a warning that the smoking product companies was intensifying efforts to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“We see evidence of industry lobbying everywhere. Corporate signatures are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN high-level meeting,” said the tobacco industry watchdog.

Possible outcomes

“When public health regulation fails to be approved because of this letter, the cost might be borne in lives of people who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The public health measure being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and requiring that pictorial cautions cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Through correspondence, the company recommends this be reduced to 30% or 50% “within the WHO-FCTC recommended threshold”, postponed for minimum 12 months after the bill passes.

Global health authorities in fact recommends a alert needs to encompass at least half of the product container front “and seek to occupy as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings must cover 65% of a packet’s front and back.

Flavor restrictions debate

The corporation requests the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavoured tobacco products, arguing that it would drive users to “illegally traded” products. It suggests restricting fewer varieties of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The draft bill suggests penalties for multiple violations “ranging from a fraction of annual sales to a decade in prison”.

Business explanation

Via documentation, the company executive of British American Tobacco Zambia says the corporation is focused on responsible corporate conduct” and “supports the objectives of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the connected wellbeing effects” but claims that “certain measures can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued the company's suggested modifications would “weaken this legislation so much that the necessary effect for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that many such provisions operated within the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “total double standard”, he commented.

“We exist in a international community. If I plant tobacco in my garden and harvest that and sell it out – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to enrich myself and all the future family lines while my neighbour’s children are succumbing … is in itself complete moral collapse.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the United Kingdom or other countries had not resulted in corporate closures, the campaigner stated. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. It only protects the people.”

Official corporate statement

A BAT Zambia spokesperson stated: “The company operates its business in compliance with applicable local laws. Moreover, the firm contributes in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the appropriate structures which enable interested party involvement in regulation development.”

The corporation remained “not opposed to regulation”, they said, noting that minors should be safeguarded against obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We advocate for evolving legislation to realize planned community wellbeing objectives, while acknowledging the spectrum of entitlements and duties on businesses, users and involved parties,” the spokesperson stated, noting that the corporation's recommendations “mirror the circumstances of the local commercial environment and cigarette sector, which includes increasing amounts of black market activity”.

The country's office of trade, commerce and industry was contacted for response.